<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attention religious right: get a grip!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tobiasly.com/2005/08/15/attention-religious-right-get-a-grip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tobiasly.com/2005/08/15/attention-religious-right-get-a-grip/</link>
	<description>My blog about triathlon training, technology, politics, and dogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:49:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.tobiasly.com/2005/08/15/attention-religious-right-get-a-grip/comment-page-1/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve visited your blog. I noticed you&#039;ve added Google ads, an IE warning (which I only saw because I had to use IE to view the Google ads which FF&#039;s Adblock thankfully blocked), and a &quot;Bite me, spammers!&quot; link w/ a bit of creative &quot;spamming the spammers&quot; programming behind it. Well done... I wondered if you coded that or if it was an extension/plug-in, but I couldn&#039;t find out as I&#039;m apparently barred from the admin area now. :/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m glad to see this post and agree with most of it. I&#039;m glad to see you holding to your values faster than to your color so to speak, and that you disagree with those groups and stances like those as much as I disagree with Clinton and Lieberman&#039;s on filthy evil video games. It&#039;s puzzling to me how social libertarians and proponents of small government can support policies that seem to be in direct opposition of their own status-defining values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve visited your blog. I noticed you&#8217;ve added Google ads, an IE warning (which I only saw because I had to use IE to view the Google ads which FF&#8217;s Adblock thankfully blocked), and a &quot;Bite me, spammers!&quot; link w/ a bit of creative &quot;spamming the spammers&quot; programming behind it. Well done&#8230; I wondered if you coded that or if it was an extension/plug-in, but I couldn&#8217;t find out as I&#8217;m apparently barred from the admin area now. :/</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see this post and agree with most of it. I&#8217;m glad to see you holding to your values faster than to your color so to speak, and that you disagree with those groups and stances like those as much as I disagree with Clinton and Lieberman&#8217;s on filthy evil video games. It&#8217;s puzzling to me how social libertarians and proponents of small government can support policies that seem to be in direct opposition of their own status-defining values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

